head	1.2;
access;
symbols
	HEAD-20130225:1.1.1.1 HEAD:1.1.1;
locks; strict;
comment	@# @;


1.2
date	2013.02.25.01.37.14;	author dholland;	state dead;
branches;
next	1.1;

1.1
date	2013.02.25.00.59.50;	author dholland;	state Exp;
branches
	1.1.1.1;
next	;

1.1.1.1
date	2013.02.25.00.59.50;	author dholland;	state Exp;
branches;
next	;


desc
@@


1.2
log
@Remove this copy; it is broken. admins please G/C if possible
@
text
@# $NetBSD: modorder,v 1.1 2013/02/25 00:59:50 dholland Exp $

LIST=		one two three four five six seven eight nine ten
LISTX=		${LIST:Ox}
LISTSX:=	${LIST:Ox}
TEST_RESULT= && echo Ok || echo Failed

# unit-tests have to produce the same results on each run
# so we cannot actually include :Ox output.
all:
	@@echo "LIST      = ${LIST}"
	@@echo "LIST:O    = ${LIST:O}"
	# Note that 1 in every 10! trials two independently generated
	# randomized orderings will be the same.  The test framework doesn't
	# support checking probabilistic output, so we accept that the test
	# will incorrectly fail with probability 2.8E-7.
	@@echo "LIST:Ox   = `test '${LIST:Ox}' != '${LIST:Ox}' ${TEST_RESULT}`"
	@@echo "LIST:O:Ox = `test '${LIST:O:Ox}' != '${LIST:O:Ox}' ${TEST_RESULT}`"
	@@echo "LISTX     = `test '${LISTX}' != '${LISTX}' ${TEST_RESULT}`"
	@@echo "LISTSX    = `test '${LISTSX}' = '${LISTSX}' ${TEST_RESULT}`"
	@@echo "BADMOD 1  = ${LIST:OX}"
	@@echo "BADMOD 2  = ${LIST:OxXX}"
@


1.1
log
@Initial revision
@
text
@d1 1
a1 1
# $NetBSD: modorder,v 1.2 2007/10/05 15:27:46 sjg Exp $
@


1.1.1.1
log
@Import a copy of make from HEAD. I'm going to beating this one like a
rented mule. :-)

For various reasons it seems like using othersrc for this particular
hacking run is a better idea than using a branch in src; for one thing
I'm likely to be adding and removing files, and for another it is more
likely that this version will become a guide for making more measured
updates to the master version than that it will eventually itself
become the master version.

@
text
@@