head     1.1;
branch   1.1.1;
access   ;
symbols  FROMHEAD-20130225:1.1.1.1 FROMHEAD:1.1.1;
locks    ; strict;
comment  @# @;


1.1
date     2013.02.25.01.33.22;  author dholland;  state Exp;
branches 1.1.1.1;
next     ;

1.1.1.1
date     2013.02.25.01.33.22;  author dholland;  state Exp;
branches ;
next     ;


desc
@@



1.1
log
@Initial revision
@
text
@STR1=
STR2=	a
STR3=	ab
STR4=	abc
STR5=	abcd
STR6=	abcde
STR7=	abcdef
STR8=	abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

all:
	@@echo ${STR1:hash}
	@@echo ${STR2:hash}
	@@echo ${STR3:hash}
	@@echo ${STR4:hash}
	@@echo ${STR5:hash}
	@@echo ${STR6:hash}
	@@echo ${STR7:hash}
	@@echo ${STR8:hash}
@


1.1.1.1
log
@Import a copy of make from HEAD. I'm going to be beating this one like
a rented mule. :-)
   
For various reasons it seems like using othersrc for this particular
hacking run is a better idea than using a branch in src; for one thing
I'm likely to be adding and removing files, and for another it is more 
likely that this version will become a guide for making more measured
updates to the master version than that it will eventually itself
become the master version.

try 2: don't try to use HEAD as the branch tag as it makes CVS very upset.

@
text
@@